For the dough...

What can you do with a bread machine? 

Photos of me getting my oats

I may have mentioned a few posts back that for oaty bread I prefer using the thicker kind of rolled oats. If you've really been paying attention you'd also have noticed that I ran out recently and was planning a trip to Famous Foods to get some more.

Being the kind-hearted sort of chap that I am and being keen to help my reader find the right kind of oats I thought I'd try to demonstrate the difference visually. This particular shop specialises in bulk dry goods that they pack themselves. It's a great place to buy beans, grains, meal, flour, herbs, spices and jerky. Unless, of course, you don't live near Vancouver. But I'm sure you get the idea.
You will see, then, from the photographs below the difference between the two types of rolled oats. The ones on the left, of which I purchased 2.5kg because they're great, are thicker, larger and less mealy than those on the right which are, frankly, ordinary.
You will also see from the picture of the packaging that the true, favoured oats are described as 'Slow Cooking' whereas the flimsier variety are 'Quick Cooking'. If you want the full chewy texture effect, avoid any Quick Cooking oats.
Now you know which are the right oats, go out and get them.
   
Click here to download:
Photos_of_me_getting_my_oats.zip (278 KB)
For the record, these are officially the 5th and 7th most unintersting photographs I have ever taken.

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [1]

Top tip: Proving the easy way

For many years I would use bread recipes by people like Delia Smith and others. They're fine and give a great grounding in the basics of breadmaking. However, I always got frustrated when it came time to leave the dough to prove.

This is a critical part of the operation. You need to leave the dough for at least an hour somewhere moderately warm so that the yeast or leaven can do its stuff. Air bubbles form, gluten hydrates and forms lovely long stretchy chains, flavours develop and the dough expands to at least double its original size.
But you can't just leave it lying around. It needs a humid atmosphere to prevent the dough drying and a nasty skin forming.
Some writers suggest leaving it in the mixing bowl covered with cling film. Result: dough rises and sticks to cling film and you have a horridable mess to clean up. 
Some would suggest covering it with a damp tea-towel: either the tea towel would sag, or the dough would rise and stick, or the tea towel would dry out and a nasty crust would form on top of the dough.
Others turned the problem on its head: leave the dough on the counter top, and cover it with the mixing bowl. Great if you have a huge kitchen where you can leave workspace undisturbed for that long. Not so great if you need to move things around.
But then one day, about 6 or 7 years ago, I hit upon the answer. I'm pretty sure I didn't have the idea myself, but it changed my life! The absolutely positively best way to leave a bowl of dough to prove, is to stick the bowl in a suitably capacious carrier bag, inflate it and seal it up. The carrier bag keeps the air from circulating, so all the humidity from the dough remains inside. But by inflating it first, you leave plenty of room for the rising and unless your children decide it would be fun to land their spaceships on it, the dough won't stick.
Try it - it's great. Once you've got the hang of it, you'll find that by employing expansive arm movements as you swish the bag around the bowl and tuck the mouth of the bag underneath, the bag practically self-inflates. Think of a second-rate magician manoeuvering his cape around the top hat as he subtly hoiks the bunny out of the hidden pocket and deposits it in the previously empty top hat.
A couple of caveats:
1. Child-friendly carrier bags are useless. Only shop where they don't put holes in the bottom of the bags.
2. Save up the larger bags. Ikea carrier bags are fantastic - which is probably why my old friend Mr Thomson is such a keen breadmaker.
3. Make sure they are clean before you use them. If they've had potatoes in, probably best to save them for something less important - like the kids' lunch.
4. They get pretty damp inside during use. Turn them inside-out to dry before storing for the next time.
5. If you're leaving dough to prove on the stovetop, make sure you don't turn the wrong hotplate on. It can be messy.
Of course, this is all completely worthless information if you just want to use a bread machine, but as you can probably tell - the machine hasn't really captured my imagination yet.

This bag came from Victoria 32nd Supermarket in Vancouver, but you could use one from almost anywhere.

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [1]

It's alive...

Back in the UK I had a few stabs at making sourdough bread. On the whole I was quite pleased with the results. Combined with the traditional French baguette flour that I had found an online source for, I made some breads that I considered to be rather special. I also had some dismal failures, but that's part of the fun of sourdough.

After a week of bread machining, I was itching to get back to some real breadmaking. I thought it was about time I kicked off another leaven starter.

This time I tried a different approach, suggested by Dan Lepard in his book 'The Handmade Loaf'. The book itself is very attractive but rather daunting. However, he claimed that his sourdough method almost guaranteed a good, healthy leaven within a week.

So day one, I mixed a couple of tablespoons of white flour and a couple of tablespoons of wholewheat flour with about 50ml of warm water, and a couple of tablespoons of live natural yogurt. Into this I also mixed a couple of dried prunes. He suggested raising or currants but prunes were the only dried fruit we had. I put the lot in a jar and left it, partially covered.

The aim of this mixture was to bring together ingredients that should provide a good combination of yeasts (from the flours and the air) and lactic-acid producing bacteria for the sourness (from the yogurt). The dried fruit was supposed to be another source of yeast, although to be honest I suspect the prunes I used had been washed pretty thoroughly in the factory, so I don't know if they really helped. The flour, of course, also provides the food for those organisms so they can start producing gas, acid and lots of little baby yeasts and bacteria.

After 3 or 4 days adding 2tbsp plain flour and 50ml of tepid water and giving it a good mix each day I had a really revolting-looking mess. In spite of its appearance, it was rather gratifying to find it starting to smell like real sourdough. < /p>

I strained out all the fruit and bran, poured away 75% of the mixture and then blended the remainder with around 100g flour and 125ml of water. Having repeated this twice, on day seven it was finally ready for action. This is how it looks now - as you can see it's nice and frothy on top. The consistency is a thick liquid - similar in consistency to runny honey. I have now made a couple of loaves with it and am pleased with its performance. More about that later...

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [2]

Rustic oaten loaf

I tried a variation on the oaten bread recipe last night. I tried it with a higher proportion of oats and no butter, just for a laugh:
 
420g water
200g rolled oats
2tbsp brown sugar
1 tsp salt
400g white flour
1 tsp yeast
 
Cooked on the basic setting - 3.5 hour cycle with about 6 hours sitting before the cycle kicked in.
 
I use the word 'rustic' to describe this one because it's amazing what a difference those changes made. The dough was quite wet enough, the crumb is very moist, but it has a wonderful heavy chewiness, just enough to know you're really eating something. It could probably do without quite so much sugar, although it did give it a wonderful toffee aroma when it was just cooked.
 
It rose a lot less than the previous oaten loaf, not surprising given the increased proportion of oats. The other interesting thing about it was that the crust turned our much thicker than in other loaves, in spite of the overall program being the same and the mass of dough being roughly the same. My eldest son loved the bread, but turned his nose up at the crusts, although I absolutely love a nice chewy crust.
 
Unfortunately I have now run out of rolled oats. I have a day's leave tomorrow to go and help out at my son's school for the day. Hopefully I'll get some time to pick up some more at Famous Foods tomorrow so I can continue my experiments. I bet you can't wait for the next instalment.

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [2]

Oaten bread

One of my favourite breads for making the traditional way was an oaten loaf. I use coarse rolled oats - not the finely milled oatmeal that is sold in supermarkets for porridge (or porage). They look kinda like they've just taken each grain and lightly squashed it with a padded hammer. These make for a great texture to a loaf when mixed with regular white bread flour. They do need soaking, which can be achieved in the machine by putting the oats in directly after the water and then delaying the program by at least an hour. When I tried making this bread without soaking, it ended up pretty patchy, dry and inedible. Adding the oats also seems to impact the amount of water required to make a good loaf.

This is the recipe as I tried it first in the machine:

480g water
25g butter
150g  rolled oats
1 tbsp brown sugar
1 tsp salt
450g all-purpose flour
1 1/4 tsp yeast

Cooked on the basic program for a 2.5lb loaf, medium crust (3 1/2 hrs with 5-6 hours sitting before the program started).

This produced a loaf that was a little on the moist side, but still very tasty. The crumb was soft without falling apart too much when spreading on it. Unfortunately the top of the loaf had somewhat sunk - probably because it rose a little too vigorously. I'll have to try it with less yeast.

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [0]

I need to concentrate more

Over the past few days I've made more white bread. The first one was with this recipe:

350g water
25g butter
1 tsp salt
1 tbsp brown sugar
500g flour
1 tsp yeast

I solved the problem of the bread making content with the observation port. The bread wasn't bad - I set it on the 'sandwich, 2.5lb' setting. Not too crumbly.

I had intended the next day to make a similar loaf but with cream of tartar to see if it made any difference. The next being Friday, I was invited out for a beer after work with some of the team. Now, I don't go out that often any more. So one beer became two, and before I know it I was on the number 19 at midnight just waking up in time to hear my stop being called.

I did manage to get it together enough to set the bread machine off with the same recipe on Friday night. This won't come as a surprise to readers who know me and my tendency to start cooking when drunk. I made a smashing whisky soufflé on my stag night, but that's another story. However, I realised on awaking that I couldn't for the life of me remember whether I put the tartar in or not. Either way, the bread was OK. Bread machine bread is not very aesthetically pleasing, though, is it? A definite touch of the elephant man about it. It also leaves these annoying holes in the bottom. I understand that in developed countries you can buy bread machines with retractable whirling thingers, but in Canada we have to make do with this.

   
Click here to download:
I_need_to_concentrate_more.zip (182 KB)

I'll have to try the tartar thing again next week. Next time, I'll remember to make notes as I go.

 

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [1]

Lesson one: don't leave it in

For the first trial I went for a pretty standard white bread recipe:

450g Water
2 tbsp brown sugar
2 tsp salt
50g butter
750g All-purpose white flour (Rogers bleached)
1/4 tsp cream of tartar
1 1/2 tsp instant magic yeast

Being a new toy, I wanted to watch it do its stuff so I set it off immediately. Unfortunately it was already around 9.30pm. I gave up waiting at midnight just as it was starting to bake. By then I had already realised that the dough had risen so much it was touching the window at the top. Unfortunately this meant that it was sitting in the pan until I woke up next morning - not good for cooling or drying out. But that's not the point - I got to watch it mix & knead.

The results were OK. It tasted fine, although the crust was quite thick. However, the smell for some reason wasn't that real fresh bread smell you get from cooking loaves in the oven. Hopefully that's just down to the newness of the machine, otherwise I'm going to go off it very quick. The consistency was pretty good with a large crumb that didn't fall apart when buttering. It toasted really nicely, thanks presumably to the sugar.

The cream of tartar is something I've been experimenting with in bread I've made by hand over the past couple of years. The theory is that a slightly acid environment helps strengthen the gluten. Now I can theoritically make batch after batch in identical circumstances, I can see whether it really makes any difference. Results by hand have been inconclusive, but that's just as likely because I can't be arsed to be consistent with the hand kneading and other ingredients.

First impressions: I'm definitely not a bread machine convert yet...

Next time, I'm going to try the delayed program, so it's just done when I get up. I bet you can't wait.

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [3]

Explorations with a bread machine

I bought a Black & Decker bread machine. Always last to jump on a bandwagon. There's not a great choice of models on the Canadian market and they're marking them down, so I thought it's time to dive in.

My interest is really in the idea of making dough rather than baking a whole loaf. I've never been that impressed with the results of bread baked in machines when I've tried it at friends houses. The crust never seems right, and the holes left by the kneading paddles seem to mess up more slices that they really should. Fresh baked bread should be a thing of beauty, and I've never seen beauty coming from a bread machine.

On the other hand, if I could get it to prepare dough overnight so it's ready to slam in the oven first thing in the morning, it would be a real boon. Making bread at the weekend, unless I get up at 6am which is really not what weekends are about, involves being tied to the house until lunchtime. I can get on with other things while it's rising, but still it's hard to go out for more than 30 minutes without risking things going flat.

I want to get scientific about trying out variations on recipes as well, so I'd really like to be able to try things under controlled conditions. Just doing one or two batches at weekends isn't going to get very far very fast, but with the breadmaker I could get mix things overnight, get up and put it in the oven, check my emails and still get to work at a reasonable hour.

So that's the theory. How will it work in practice? Keep reading and find out.

Posted by Rich Baldry 

Comments [7]